NEW YORK (AP) — Elon Musk is leaving Washington after a short but turbulent stint in government and getting back to his numerous businesses, each with their own set of issues for the billionaire to address.
Start with his electric car company Tesla. While how much Musk accomplished in his role as President Donald Trump’s chief cost-cutter is up for debate, it’s clear his association with right-wing politics damaged Tesla’s brand and tanked sales.
Musk’s social media platform X, formerly Twitter, needs to rebuild its advertising base; his aerospace company SpaceX appears to be financially promising but has seen some recent setbacks; and it’s unclear if his satellite business Starlink can keep striking deals without Trump nearby.
Here’s a look at the state of some key Musk businesses.
Tesla trouble
Profits plunged 71% at Tesla in the first three months of the year right after a Chinese competitor claimed the mantle as the world’s biggest electric car seller.
The big question now: Will Musk’s leaving Washington help lure buyers back?
The answer is crucial to reviving profits because so much else is uncertain. Tesla’s lineup of cars is aging and its foreign rivals have become much more competitive. They would be taking market share from Tesla even in the best of circumstances.
Tesla’s decision to close down factories as it retooled its best-selling Model Y, among other temporary problems, contributed to its struggles in the first quarter. But the blowback from Musk’s time in Washington has some analysts and investors worried.
In a note to clients, JP Morgan warned of “unprecedented brand damage.” Wedbush Securities said at one point, “This is a full blown crisis.” And a group of smaller investors just Wednesday wrote to Tesla’s board demanding it require Musk to spend at least 40 hours a week repairing its “plummeting global reputation” among other problems.
News earlier this week from Europe doesn’t bode well: Sales in April plunged by half.
Taxis with no driver
Another big test for Musk: Will Tesla’s launch of its first ever driverless taxis prove successful?
Musk has been talking about robotaxis for more than a decade, but next month they may finally hit the road. He has promised to test 10 or 20 robotaxis in Austin, Texas, then ramp that up to hundreds of thousands by the end of next year.
“Can you go to sleep in our cars and wake up at your destination?” the billionaire asked investors in a conference call last month, then answered, “I’m confident that will be available in many cities in the U.S. by the end of this year.”
Investors are convinced Musk will deliver, judging by the 50% jump in Tesla stock since he made that statement. But he faces many challenges, not least is whether technically the taxis will work without hitting things — or people.
Federal safety regulators last month requested data from Telsa on how the robotaxis will perform in low-visibility conditions. That request comes after an investigation into 2.4 million Teslas last year equipped with Full Self-Driving software after several accidents, including one in which a pedestrian was killed.
Even if the Austin test goes off without a hitch, Musk faces another challenge: Waymo.
The driverless taxi company owed by Google parent Alphabet just logged its ten-millionth trip and is now operating in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and several other cities.
Ad rebound at X?
After Musk bought Twitter in 2022 and opened it up to all manner of conspiracy theories, long-time advertisers began to flee. Then Musk made the situation worse when he threatened to “name and shame” them, and sued them.
Now advertisers are inching back, though maybe not for a good reason.
“Some big brands resumed spending on X in part to curry favor with the Trump administration, or to avoid potential retaliation by Musk,” said e-marketer analyst Jasmine Enberg,. “But fear is not a sustainable motivator, and most were spending less than they were previously.”
She expects X’s ad business will rebound this year, but still be smaller than it was before Musk bought the company.
Rockets red glare
It’s not clear how well Musk’s rocket company SpaceX is faring because the private company doesn’t disclose its finances. That said, news headlines point to both troubles and triumphs.
First the bad development, which came just this week with a spinning explosion of one of the company’s Starship mega rockets over the Indian Ocean. That followed explosions of two other Starships earlier this year that sprayed flaming debris across the Caribbean Ocean.
Undeterred, Musk is vowing several more tests soon but the stakes are high and the clock is ticking. NASA hopes to use Starship for future missions to the moon, including one next year that will attempt a lunar orbit and then send the four astronauts aboard back home.
The good news is that investors who have gotten a peek at SpaceX’s finances apparently are excited.
A private financing round for the company a few months ago followed by a private sale of shares recently have reportedly valued SpaceX at $350 billion, a big jump from a $210 billion estimated value just a year ago.
It’s business, not politics — or is it?
A SpaceX satellite internet subsidiary called Starlink also has been striking deals to set up in foreign countries. But it’s not clear how much is the result of cold business calculation and how much is due to politics, an advantage that could disappear as Musk leaves Washington.
Accompanying Trump on his trip to Saudi Arabia earlier this month, Musk announced that the country had approved Starlink service for aviation and maritime use. That followed a decision to grant approval for the service by regulators in Bangladesh, whose garment industry would be devastated by Trump’s threatened 37% tariff, along with a string of other deals in India, Pakistan and Lesotho in recent months.
Next up: South Africa, maybe.
Earlier this month, following Trump’s Oval Office dressing down of that country’s president, regulators in the country loosened a rule in a way that could help Starlink win a foothold in the country. Musk had called the rule requiring Black partial ownership of any new foreign venture “openly racist.”
The country denies that politics influenced its decision.
—-
AP Writer Barbara Ortutay contributed to this story from San Francisco.
